Action For Autism

Supporting Autistic People

Judge Rotenberg Center - every law they break

To follow on from yesterday’s post on the JRC, it sems that while it may be legal under Massachussetts State Law to detain people against their will and torture them with electric shocks, it is illegal to record their screams without their express consent. This email explains it all. It sounds petty compared to the daily misery endured by the inmates at JRC. But, hey, whatever helps to close them down. Please respond directly to Ken Mollins if you have any information pertaining to this or to the grand jury investigation of abuses at the Judge Rotenberg Center.

Dear fellow advocates: 

This latest letter from Attorney Kenneth Mollins exposes the illegal practice of recording all conversations at the Judge Rotenberg Educational Center in violation of Massachusetts State Law.
Please forward this letter to others and post on lists.  Permission is granted by Kenneth Mollins.

If any readers have had their privacy violated at JRC you may want to contact Kenneth Mollins, or myself and I will forward your information to Ken. Perhaps this can be a concerted effort. You may also want to address your own personal letter to Attorney General Martha Coakley if you have been violated in this manner, or if you are aware of other criminal matters at JRC.

Thank you, for your active advocacy. Please remember that change can only occur if we take action! Our silence is only golden for Dr. Israel.

May 16, 2008

Via Facsimile (508)795-1991

Attorney General Martha Coakley
One Exchange Place, 3rd Floor
Worcester, MA 01608

Re:  Judge Rotenberg Center

Dear Attorney General Coakley:

 I am writing concerning ongoing apparent criminal activity that is occurring on a daily basis at the Judge Rotenberg Center (“JRC”) in Canton, Massachusetts, and where numerous people are being subjected to said criminal activities on a daily basis. Mass. Ann. Laws ch. 272, §99 states:

It is a crime to record any conversation, whether oral or wire, without the consent of all parties in Massachusetts…

 I have spoken with numerous prior employees of the JRC who all advise me that the entire school and residences are subject to the recording of conversations taken therein. These recordings not only apply to the students and faculty, but to the mailman, the person who delivers lunch, and to any other person entering the facility, all of whom are being recorded and replayed without their consent. I was in the facility back in early 2006 to meet with a client, and thereafter I was advised by both staff and parents of students in the facility that my conversations were recorded without my consent. In addition, I have spoken with others who have been in the facility without consenting to their conversations being recorded.

 The criminality described herein is made worse by an examination of the release signed by the parents of students attending this center. I am enclosing herewith a copy of the applicable portion of the release which is the same release signed from 2003 to the present, the section enumerated as “H. Filming/Photographs.” The fact that audio taping and recordings are made during therapy sessions is expressed, but in the paragraph consenting to same, the audio portion is specifically deleted, and the consent goes to video taping and/or photograph of the student. This omission specifically vitiates any consent by the parent of any student or parent from September 2003 to the present. As such, I believe there are thousands of victims of criminality in violation of the aforestated section, of which I am one. In addition, in speaking with March Network, the company that does the video surveillance at JRC, they have also advised me that all conversations that take place in said center are recorded.

 I ask that you immediately cause this criminality to cease and to prosecute the thousands of alleged criminal acts that appear to have occurred at this center and as a victim I hereby demand that you seek both monetary and criminal sanctions against those for acting in concert to commit a violation of the aforesaid criminal statute.

 I am aware that you are currently investigating the JRC and that a grand jury has been convened to investigate criminal acts. It might save the taxpayers of Massachusetts time and expense if you present evidence to a grand jury of the criminal acts revealed herein. I will be happy to testify as well will others I have spoken with concerning same.
 
Very truly yours,
 
LAW OFFICE OF KENNETH M. MOLLINS, P.C.

By: 
KENNETH M. MOLLINS
KMM/mc
cc: MA Governor Deval L. Patrick
NYS Attorney General, Andrew M. Cuomo

May 17th, 2008 Posted by Mike | Autism rights, Judge Rotenberg Center | 4 comments

4 Responses to “Judge Rotenberg Center - every law they break”

  1. Wiretapping. AWESOME.

    I’m sure that Mr. Mollins is a smart guy; wanna bet that they have not instituted the required consent signatures for their employees? Careful companies that must record conversations (for legal reasons) will normally make their employees sign a consent to be recorded as a condition of continued employment. Without those consents, they may run afoul of the FEDERAL law on wiretapping, requiring that at least one party to the conversation consent to the recording.

    A deliberate pattern of breaking a Federal criminal law, such as wiretapping, can be the basis of a RICO charge. That can be pursued civilly. . . .although it is more difficult all the time to do so.

  2. That reminds me of how notorious ganster was finally put in jail for — tax evasion!

    andrea

  3. Thanks for both of your posts on the JRC, Mike.

    Sunshine is a great way to sterilize germs.

    Joe

  4. Andrea
    if you read Thinking in Metaphors you can add perjury to the manifold crimes of the JRC

Leave a Reply