Action For Autism

Supporting Autistic People

The Great Autism Rip-Off

Over on Left Brain Right Brain Kev has just blogged this article in the Mail. The article starts in typical tabloid style:

There is little hope given to parents of children with autism. Mainstream medicine offers no explanation for the cause of this life-long learning disability, thought to affect one in 100, and there are no effective treatments.Perhaps the most cruel characteristic of the condition, which impairs communication development and ability to relate to others, is that children often develop normally until about two years of age, when they suddenly ‘regress’, becoming mute, withdrawn, refusing to make eye contact and prone to tantrums.

Many never take part in mainstream education and some require full-time care, even as adults.

In the absence of solutions, desperate parents are increasingly turning to the world of alternative medicine in their search for a cure.

Or does it? There are the usual buzzwords - hope, desperate, cruel. But autism is described as a life-long learning disability, not strictly true but better than the usual this devastating disease. And the headline

The great autism rip-off …

How a huge industry feeds on parents desperate to cure their children

suggests more substance than I have come to expect from a paper that has done more than most to promote Andy Wakefield and the MMR scare over autism. Now they are investigating the claims of alternative therapists who sell dubious treatments to parents on the back of the media hype about vaccines and autism. The world is turning.

Journalist, Barney Calman posed as a parent and contacted 5 different Defeat Autism Now (DAN) practitioners. All charged serious money just to talk to the parent on their own and suggested an expensive battery of tests without ever seeing the child. All were happy to discuss a variety of treatment options and claimed great success while pointing out that their therapies might not work for a minority of children.

This is the beauty of quackery. You pay money for tests that indicate treatment. But they do not indicate if the treatment will work. So the parent moves on to the next practitioner in the hope of finding the one therapy that will work for their child.

First up was a former GP, David O’Connell who took £440 in consultation fees without ever seeing the child and recommended a barrage of tests on blood, stool and urine costing a further £1546. His recommended treatment is Secretin! He claims that previous studies were flawed. What, even this one? As I wrote elsewhere

The CEO of Repligen had a double interest in Secretin. He was not just another businessman looking for a profit. He was also the parent of two autistic children. He wanted it to work and he was ready to pay handsomely to make it work. Unfortunately his company’s research, rigourously conducted to satisfy the US regulatory bodies, “failed to meet the study’s dual primary endpoints.” That has not stopped other, less scrupulous individals from continuing to promote secretin and even homeopathic secretin as a cure for autism.

O’Connell goes on to state that

I’ve not published my findings in peer reviewed journals because I am unwilling to submit children to double blind trials.

But he will submit them to unproven treatments like Secretin at £450 monthly injection and immune globulin at £550. These quotes are revealing.

‘The only limiting factor is money.’

[...]‘The more injections a child has, the better the result,’ he says.

‘Autism can be a life sentence if you do nothing about it. And the sooner you start treatment, the more chance it will work.’

Parents used to be blamed for causing their child’s autism in the bad old days of Bettleheim’s refrigerator mothers. Now they are encouraged to blame themselves and then pay large sums for unproven and potentially harmful treatments in order to ease their guilt.

Next up was

Dr Asha Rekha Chagarlamudi, a locum GP who runs ‘The Autism Clinic’ one day a week from her home, a semi-detached house on a private estate in Bromley, South-East London.

She recommended IV chelation (Remember Abubakar Tariq Nadama?) and Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy. (HBOT) She does not seem quite as mercenary as O’Donnell but I was a little perturbed because she is the medical advisor to the Autism Treatment Trust in Edinburgh. That is an eight hour drive away, which is not very convenient if the non-medical Dr Amet in Edinburgh needs treatment advice. Like Dr Chagarlamudi Dr Amet has an autistic child herself and was featured in this blog.

Dr Amet makes the striking claim that her series of blood and urine tests (£480) will give a complete picture of your child’s health and what has caused his autism. Her follow up consultation (£400) will discuss the test results and devise a treatment plan consisting of a special diet and supplements contains no mention of the IV chelation and HBOT recommended by her medical advisor 440 miles away, down in Kent, which is probably for the best.

Surprisingly, the cheapest therapist is based in that bastion of privilege and private medicine, Harley Street. Dr Damien Downing will do an initial consultation, urine and blood tests, follow up and seven rounds of transdermal chelation for just under £700. The only drawback is that transdermal chelators do not work

[S]ome enterprising doctors have formulated skin creams containing chelators like Transdermal DMSA. There are glowing testimonials for TD DMSA on the web. But DMSA is water soluble and so it is extremely unlikely that it could ever pass through the skin. Think about it. Our skin is a barrier that acts to keeps the water in. Without it we would dehydrate and die. It also keeps the water out. We do not absorb water like a sponge when we bathe or shower. So how does the DMSA pass through our skin? It does not. And so there is no way for it to have any effect on our bodies at all.

Calman also went to Dublin to meet

Dr Gabriel Stewart, a specialist in chelation therapy for adults, who tells me he tries to dissuade parents from giving their autistic children intravenous infusions ‘not because it’s dangerous, but because it isn’t effective in clearing mercury from the blood’. Consequently, Archie was not suitable for treatment.

He also warns that some ‘DAN! doctors’ are less than reputable.

‘All you need to do is attend one conference in the US and you can say you’re a DAN! doctor - and many of them aren’t medically trained.’

All this is true. It is also true that Dr Stewart is also a DAN doctor. While his refusal to use IV chelation on children is commendable his website reveals that he is a member of ACAM, whose ambiguities over the use of EDTA were exposed at the time of Tariq Nadama’s death. And he has bought into the entire DAN protocols for treating autism. The scientific bases for these protocols are being seriously challenged by expert witnesses in the Omnibus Autism Proceeedings that are taking place in the USA. See this example where the expert testimony of Dr Dean Jones is discussed.

All in all, an excellent piece of journalism from Mr Calman, marred only by a factual error in a sidebar on What is Autism. The prevalence figure of one in a hundred refers to the entire autistic spectrum. So called classic autism with associated learning difficulties is closer to 1 in 500.

June 1st, 2008 Posted by Mike | Autism, DAN!, Quackery, biomedical interventions, chelation, mercury, vaccines | 7 comments

7 Responses to “The Great Autism Rip-Off”

  1. So called Classic autism with associated learning difficulties, is that what they taught you in Sheffield?

    How little you know, how little you have read and studied, how little you have absorbed from this web world you participate in, to repeat a construct that has nothing whatever to do with Kanners original work, not that Kanners original work has much to do with autism as it actually exists in the real world, class biased elitist product of his times that he was.

  2. Larry, do not shoot the messenger. It is what was written in the Mail. I am guessing that the sort of autism they have in mind is the sort I encounter every day at school - people who meet the criteria for autistic disorder and also meet the criteria for learning difficulties. I think it is fair to say that they are a minority of the entire spectrum.

  3. Quite right, Mike. Mind you - I would add that there are some who would regard the social issues associated with ASD’s as learning difficulties without exception.

    Indeed, the Great Autism Rip Off. And in the UK it started with Andrew Wakefield!

  4. Mike,
    You sound like a well meaning person but you are falling into the part of the problem rather than part of the solution. There is a solution to the problem of Autism because there is a solution to all problems. You folks over there should consider rowing in the same direction and getting some standards. We are no better here is the US and it drives me crazy to see naysayer’s when parents are doing everything they can to help their child. I work 7 days a week to make money to give to doctor whom I think may be ripping me off with snakeoil however as long as it does not hurt my child I will give it a shot because I refuse to leave anything untried. ABA, Suppository Chelation, Methel B12, Valtrex, B12 shots, secretin, Gluten/Casein free diet, Hyperbaric Oxygen chamber have all been tried. Hell Stem Cells are even on the table now if I can get another job! The focus and effort should not be in blanket “this is a rip-off” statements but fact based, with parents, consensus statements so parents putting in the time and effort to help their children are assisted by information not misguided.

    David

  5. http://themedusafiles.blogspot.com/2009/07/why-oprah-and-jenny-mccarthy-dissapoint.html

    Mccarthy has a new brand. Her son Evan and Autism.

    http://themedusafiles.blogspot.com/2009/08/banned-by-oprahcom.html

    They kicked me off the Oprah Community. I guess Oprah has an investment in Mccarthy now. Disgusting.

  6. Autism research examines high functioning Autism (and Aspergers) but continues to ignore low functioning (severely) autistic subjects. So, if research is focused exclusively, or almost exclusively, on participants with high functioning autism or Aspergers, HOW much do we REALLY know about Autistic Disorder which, by definition, includes those with low functioning autism if we don’t’ study low functioning autism? Let’s be honest, many researchers are uninterested in an autism case that doesn’t have a direct bearing on a positive grant flow. That’s why they hyper-focus on high functioning autism. Good Autism research begins at ground zero: the lowest functioning. The key to unlocking the mystery of autism will be found at ground zero: the bottom of the spectrum..there are videos on you tube if you type in autism and self injury that illuminate the most mysterous and complex side of serious, true autism. The term autistic has been misused to describe persons with anything from cerebral allergies and schizophrenia to attention deficient disorder and post traumatic disorder. Sadly, few doctors and educators understand true cases of autism to make a correct diagnosis. So they go with the latest media driven flow. Pick and choose from a broad and ever expanding spectrum. Or worse, they guess. The hallmark traits of autism are: sensitivity to sounds, specific tastes in food/drink, strange body postures, repetitive behaviors, inability to control emotions or excitement, poor reasoning skills, needs routines, resists changes, sense of direction and memory better than other skills, thinking based on association, not reasoning, once distracted by olfactory, visual or auditory stimuli, they become preoccupied. This is markedly DIFFERENT than ADHD, in that ADHD presents as easily distracted by stimuli, BUT, the person bounces focus from one thing to another. ADHD people don’t stay hyper-focused or fixate on something. That is what you will see a truly autistic person do. Fixate.

  7. Elsa
    a quick search of PubMed using the term autistic disorder reveals 754 articles published in 2009. A similar search using Asperger’s syndrome produces 140. This is not conclusive evidence. But it does suggest that your opening statement is not supported by the data.

    Your assertions about doctors and educators are just that, assertions. I do not know which country you are in but here in the UK up until recently the problem was a lack of diagnoses because clinicians were still operating with very narrow definitions of autism. More people are being trained in the proper use of diagnostic instruments. We now understand that autism is a broad spectrum disorder in which all levels of cognitive ability are represented.

    I would be interested to learn the source of your hallmark traits as you omit what many consider to be the fundamental traits - impairment of social understanding and difficulties with the social uses of language

Leave a Reply