Measles: a non-trivial disease.
Thanks to the Gutenberg Project I have recently discovered a very old report on measles, by W. C. Rucker, Assistant Surgeon General, United States Public Health Service, 1913. It begins starkly enough with the grim statistic that 11,000 children in the USA died of measles in 1910. For those who have no memory of measles I offer this description from Rucker.
Frequently a child will go to a party and engage in innocent games in
which children are brought in close contact with one another. Perhaps
among the guests there is one with reddened, watery, eyes, which are
sensitive to light. The eyelids are perhaps a little puffy, and the guest
has a hard, high-pitched cough. The other children pay no attention to
this, and the games go on uninterruptedly. In this way a single child in
the beginning stages of measles may easily affect 15 or 20 others. This is
frequently the case when kissing games are played.
About 10 days later the children who have exposed themselves to the
disease begin to sicken. They, too, have red, watery, sensitive eyes and
puffy eyelids. In fact, in rather severe cases the whole face has a rather
swollen, puffed appearance. The throat feels parched and a dry, irritating
cough increases the discomfort. The child is apt to come home from school
feeling drowsy and irritable, not infrequently complains of chilly
sensations, and may even have a chill. At night the irritation increases,
the child is feverish, the whites of the eyeballs show little red lines
upon them, and the little sufferer has the appearance of being just ready
to cry.
If the anxious mother takes the child to the window in the morning, raises
the curtain, and examines the little one’s throat she will see that the
hard palate and back of the throat are a dull, angry red. Perhaps there
are a few little red spots on the hard palate, and if the mother will look
closely at the lining membrane of the cheek she will see some small
white-tipped, reddish spots. These are called “Koplik’s” spots, and are
one of the signs of measles.
The child is kept from school that day, and that night his fever is higher
than it was the night before. He rolls and tosses about the bed and wakes
up his mother a good many times to ask for a drink of water. This sort of
thing continues for 3 or 4 days; then, one morning when the child is
having its bath the mother sees some little dusky red spots along the hair
line. They look a good deal like flea bites. Within 24 hours this rash is
spread over the body and the child looks very much bespeckled and swollen.
In from 5 to 7 days the rash begins to fade, and within 3 or 4 days
thereafter is entirely gone away, leaving behind a faint mottling of the
skin. This is followed by a peeling off of the outer layer of the skin in
little bran-like pieces. This process is called desquamation, and lasts
about a week or 10 days.
In the meantime the fever has gone away, and as soon as the child has
finished scaling he is permitted to go out and play with the other
children, and before long is back at school. The foregoing is a
description of a mild case.
Yes, that was a mild case. He follows with a more serious case.
If measles assume a malignant type, as it sometimes does among the
nonrobust, it may be ushered in by convulsions, very high fever, and an
excessive development of all the ordinary symptoms, or the rash when it
appears, instead of being a good healthy-looking red, may be a
bluish-black discoloration which looks like a recent bruise.
Broncho-pneumonia, the most common and the most fatal of all the
complications of measles, is very apt to occur. The cough is very painful,
and death quickly relieves the sufferer.
Broncho-pneumonia is treatable nowadays but that is no reason to wish it on a child. Yet a recent comment on an article in the Times suggests precisely that. The article was a reasonable piece on the rise in measles cases (over a thousand this year so far) in the UK because of declining vaccination rates. One commenter replied:
1,000 measles cases? Trivial ! And the disease is easily treated. Your kids are more likely to be struck by lightning than to risk dying from measles, mumps and rubella. So stuff the dependency culture. And note that GPs are seriously overpaid for giving jabs.
If more people read W. C. Rucker we would see less comments like that. Do we have to wait until more people become personally acquainted with the reality of measles before we get a change in attitudes? All those people who claim that the “immuno-compromised” and those with a “genetic predisposition” are at risk from the MMR jab should consider what a full blown measles epidemic would do. Rucker again:
Measles, then, is a serious disease, sparing practically no exposed person
who has not had it. In 1846 it attacked the Faroe Islands, and the record
of that visitation is both remarkable and instructive. The island had been
free from the disease for 65 years, when a Danish cabinetmaker returned
from Copenhagen to Thorshavn with the disease. He infected two friends,
and the epidemic increased by leaps and bounds, until within a very short
time over 6,000 persons out of a population of 7,782 were attacked. Almost
every house on the island became a hospital, and the only persons who
passed through the visitation unscathed were old inhabitants who had had
the disease as children 65 years before. Not a single old person who was
not protected by a previous attack and who was exposed to the infection
failed to contract the disease.
One good thing about the Times article was that it was following a recent trend for the media to discuss vaccines and disease without mentioning autism. The MMR-autism connection seems to be thoroughly discredited with all but a few die-hards in the media nowadays. But the damage has been done and a significant number of people are now suspicious of vaccines for no good reason. The press could make some amends for its role in bringing about this state of affairs by reprinting articles like Rucker’s and reminding people of the real damage that real diseases are capable of instead of promoting unfounded fears.


Comment by isles | December 3rd, 2008
Do we have to wait until more people see real cases of measles? I’m afraid even that won’t do it. It seems to steel the resolve of anti-vaccine parents - they *have* to believe that getting measles is a good thing. Otherwise how could they live with themselves for having caused their children to suffer unnecessarily?
Comment by _Arthur | December 3rd, 2008
So, if your kid has more chances to be hit by lightning than by measles (not a correct guesstimate by the way), what are the odds of your kid catching autism BECAUSE of the measles vaccines ?
Answer: the odds cannot be calculated, and, from an epidemiologic point of view, are too low to count. Every single study shows that autism rates are the same in vaccinated children than in unvaccinated children. No proposed mechanism has withstood scrutiny.
Before the Vaccines Court, an epidemiologist expert chosen by the Petitioners argued that, yes, such a causality was too low to be detected, but that doesn’t meant it cannot possibly exist. We’ll see if the Special Masters (judges) will be moved by this oh-so-scientific absence of evidence.
Comment by laurentius-rex | December 3rd, 2008
Yeah well, been there, done that and got the T shirt and a few other diseases besides, not that it made me autistic or anything, it just was the way it was back then, but today there is no excuse for it.
Broncho Pneumonia is really cool, I had that when I was 7 months old, it was a real killer at the time, the other child in the hospital at the same time died, which was not very good odds back then in the 50’s not that pneumonia is any less kind these days. I am not sure that “death quickly relieves the sufferer” it depends upon what you mean by quick and what you mean by relief, I am quite glad not to have been so “mercifully relieved” by it.
Oh there is worse yet, in the generation before mine, never mind the generation before that. My dad had to endure in addition to the childhood illnesses I and my brother had, diptheria, and meningitis (which is no less nasty than it ever was)
Comment by Miranda | January 11th, 2009
Just because a parent chooses not to give vaccines does not mean they believe that getting measles is a good thing. Just because a parent decides not to give immunizations doesnt have to have anything to do with autism.Maybe some parents feel as though vaccines arent safe because of the ingredients. Have you ever taken time to look up the ingredients in vaccines?It is ridiculious that we have to have all types of animal tissues and cells, such as monkey kidney cells,chicken embroy,and the list continues.What about aborted fetus tissue?Lets not forget the number of toxins that are in vaccines.Dont judge a parent by their choice to give or not give vaccines.Every parent should be concerned about vaccines.No parent wishes a disease upon their child, but parents also dont wish for toxins and other unsafe ingredients to be injected into their child. To say there is no scientific evidence to support the link between autism and vaccines is stupid to me.I don’t believe we will ever see a scientific evidence. Do I believe it has a link to autism?Yes, I do because there are too many parents who have seen their child’s life disappear soon after a vaccine.I believe vaccines could also be linked to several other diseases that are on the rise;diabetes,asthma,seizures,ADD,ADHD,SIDS,etc.The DTP vaccine several years ago was removed from the market in Japan because it was causing negative side effects to the children.Japan’s rate in SIDS went down dramatically.Did the US remove the vaccines,why of course not.SIDS is on the rise.Everything is on the rise,even cancer.Why are so many children getting cancer?Could it be because they are exposed to too many toxins?Not just from vaccines but our whole environment,vaccines just add to the list of things to add toxins into your body.The number of vaccines has went up to 36 now and yet the more vaccines added to the reccommended list the more we see these other diseases on the rise.We maybe getting rid of measles,mumps,rubella,etc, but now our kids are getting diabeties,cancer,asthma,add,adhd,seizures,etc.
Comment by Chris | January 12th, 2009
Miranda, if a parent chooses to not vaccinate thinking that measles is also dangerous they are depending on herd immunity (basically being parasites).
The MMR in use in the UK has been used in the USA since 1971. IF you can show us the evidence that autism started to increase in the USA starting over thirty years ago, please share it.
Miranda, with the Japan and SIDS bit you are repeating a myth. In fact when the DTP was stopped there were increases in PERTUSSIS deaths. It is just that they could no longer blame the vaccine. Here is some documentation:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15889991?
“An antivaccine movement developed in Japan as a consequence of increasing numbers of adverse reactions to whole-cell pertussis vaccines in the mid-1970s. After two infants died within 24 h of the vaccination from 1974 to 1975, the Japanese government temporarily suspended vaccinations. Subsequently, the public and the government witnessed the re-emergence of whooping cough, with 41 deaths in 1979. This series of unfortunate events revealed to the public that the vaccine had, in fact, been beneficial. Furthermore, researchers and the Japanese government proceeded to develop safer pertussis vaccines. Japan now has the most experience worldwide with acellular pertussis vaccines, being the first country to have approved their use. This review describes the major events associated with the Japanese vaccination program. The Japanese experience should be valuable to other countries that are considering the development and use of such vaccines.”
Also, SIDS is not rising in the USA. It has been decreasing with the “Back to Sleep” campaign.